Guide What Is a Networked Book?

What happens when we try to represent the big picture? The Gates Memory project brought up the question of knowledge production in the networked age. Massive amounts of documented experience are appearing on the web, but how are these documents mediated? How are they transformed into knowledge? The problem for authors and readers of networked books is more editorial than authorial. This is something Bob understood instinctively. When we were trying to decide how to present the archives, he also understood that the editorial task should not be left to a single authority.

1. Justiz im Dritten Reich: Sondergerichte und Regimegegner (German Edition)?
2. Networked individualism: What in the world is that??
3. defining the networked book: a few thoughts and a list!
4. ?
5. Publishing Trends - The “Networked Book” Becomes the New “In” Destination.
6. A Project of the Institute for the Future of the Book.
7. Infection and Immunity (Postgraduate Medical Sciences).

We imagined ways of allowing multiple editors to curate the archives. Healthy networks produce new networks, unhealthy ones lay fallow.

The problem for those of us used to linear books is that there is never a final word. There is death or dormancy, or there is life and growth. The problem really becomes how to navigate these pathways and remain open to the constant flow of information. The networked book grows in a way that the linear book cannot. Is the UI the book? Or is it just a gigantic collection of individual photoessays? Kim, both of your posts are wonderful.

Think about canon tables in text or image , as well, of course, as the Torah or any other heavily glossed text. Bob, so nice what you say. Ben and I were curious about how to organize the groupthink using software and information visualization. I think we had cooked up some game-like scenario where six thousand photos were arranged on a grid and visitors had to click and view them to keep them alive. If the picture went un-looked-at for long enough it would fade and die These were fun ideas, but not necessarily books.

I think the aspect of the old book that will persist is the impulse to tell a story and to say something very specific to an audience. The Flickr users were passionate enough about the Gates to upload their photos, and to tell their own stories on their blogs, but it takes a much different set of skills and talents to cull a larger narrative from these individual experiences.

The Torah might have commentary affixed to it, but its core text has remained the same for millenia. Indeed, this very steadfastness is the source of its authority. The networked book, by contrast, has no fixed center. It undergoes constant change and is vulnerable to graffitii, link rot and erasure. It poses a new challenge for archivists and scholars because its iterations are perpetual. All texts are in flux.

The question is when and where and how often they are fixed, and then, for how long they remain fixed before a new layer is added or a new version rendered. Oral culture had all sorts of tricks for fixing texts in the mind. Writing got rid of the mental taxation required for the transmission of texts, opening the door for more complex forms of argumentation and new kinds of literature. Walter Ong, Marshall McLuhan and others have argued that this fundamentally reshaped the cognitive makeup of humans, as did the invention of the printing press.

We may be going through an equivalent cognitive reordering now. As Jeff said in the first comment in this thread, quoting McLuhan: Without minds and ears as attuned as those of preliterate peoples, we have little hope of carrying these epics through time in the way they were originally transmitted. So we nail them down into stable forms. Like salting meat for a long sea voyage.

To an ancient Greek, how alien would the Fagles version of the Iliad, published in paperback by Penguin seem? What does this block of dried, dye-stained pulp tell him about anything living? I see we came back to Jewish scripture and rabbinic writings. It also shows us a pretty ingenious way of creating flow in a static corpus. The Talmud displays layers of commentary like the rings of a tree.

At the center is the Mishnah, the redaction of orally delivered law flow into fixture , beneath it the Gemara, the first phase of commentary and explication by early post-temple rabbis. Then comes, in a slender column to the right, the commentary of Rashi, the great medieval French rabbi. To the left of that, the commentary of a renowned Tunisian rabbi, Nissim ben Jacob. I love how the columns of text represent people, the major respondents having earned their place in close proximity to the core texts. Compared with this, present-day textual representation on the web is still painfully primitive.

Wikipedians would do well to ponder Talmudic page design.

The Talmud may be composed of stills, but if you know how to read it, it is full of motion. Masters engage with other masters, meanings are prised apart and debated tirelessly through time. So it seems one kind of networked book, conceptually derived from the Talmud and other textual traditions, is the nesting of an artifact or series of artifacts in a living web of discourse. For that web to be coherent and powerful, new editorial and design strategies must be conceived. Another kind of networked book is the creation of structures in which free flow can take place. Here we come back to books built out of shifting databases and social software platforms like the Gates Memory Project.

I think the questions Dan, Jesse and others raised earlier of architecture and urban planning are on the right track here. A networked book may not have a fixed core, but it ought to have some structure that will guide or lend meaning to the flow. There are, after all, great virtues in stability. Those rocks in the stream that we can step across. Its street grid has been fairly stable over the past century and a half, yet the buildings on that grid have been continually razed and built over.

And through each of those buildings and neighborhoods has flowed, quicker than the demolition-construction cycle, an ever-changing stream of human characters. And through each of these characters an even quicker stream of thoughts and attitudes toward the city around them. And all of it, when sensed by the murky, ageless intelligence of the Hudson River, in the blink of an eye. To try to sum up this overlong comment, the networked book seems to be about a partial return to the flow of orality, but carrying of some of the structure and fixity of writing with us.

This new negotiation between flow and fixity will be the challenge of not just a new kind of author and a new kind of reader, but a new kind of editor and a new kind of architect. It might be important to remember that, as Adrian Johns argues, the fixity and authority of texts were notions put forward by early modern printers in an effort to outdo each other in the book market. They used these constructs to negotiate their own positions in society, and we should not mistake their claims for fact.

For example, when people have financial problems or questions they often consult a different group of friends from the ones they would seek out if they had a health problem. At the same time, the networked individualism operating system requires that people gain new social skills to operate within it. They need to develop new strategies for handling challenges as they arise. They must devote more time and energy to practicing the art of networking than their ancestors did in order to get their needs met.

They can no longer passively let the village take care of them and protect them. They must actively network to leverage the human resources they need, and they must actively manage the boundaries of their self-presentation in these networks. In the weeks and months to come, we will share some of the insights that guided the book and some of the stories that ground those insights in real human experience.

There is astonishingly good social network analysis being done these days. We invite you to tell us stories about the bright side and the dark side of your experiences as networked individuals:. This looks like a great book!

• Networked book - Wikipedia.
• defining the networked book: a few thoughts and a list | if:book.
• Navigation menu.
• networked book/book as network | if:book.
• Customers who bought this item also bought?

I think Social Networks have made some families more connected, especially those that are spread out around the world. For those that did not grow up or live in the US their entire lives, it is the way we stay connected with family and friends and hold on to a part of our heritage. You end up less disconnected.

No one knows or fesses up! Other privacy issues, the inability to control your information limits me from interacting. For example, Twitter will not delete an account unless you have access to that email, even if that email clearly no longer clearly exists. So, not being able to delete an account that is linked to a past employer and my name is frustrating.

Did it hurt your reputation in any notable way? Capacity to get insurance? Did you take steps to monitor your credit or insurance more vigilantly? When my youngest hit middle school in , the advent of the Internet and mobile phone created a change in the dynamics of relationships at home, among peers and in the parenting community. To me it felt like a home invasion and as with any crisis I also knew there was also an opportunity.

So I stopped working outside the home full time helping businesses and government apply technology to improve relations and productivity, and rather focused on how cyber technology could strengthen individual resiliency and the ability to relate to one another at home and in our community. At the time I shifted focus to the home front, it was difficult to clearly articulate my concern, but this question still haunts me today:. Love the back story on Banana Moments.

How to fix Network Discovery in Windows 10

I have found that social networking has allowed me to investigate niche interests and sub-cultures that would have otherwise been isolated by mainstream culture. Individual points of view are mediated by multiple voices. This may allow for a more democratic approach to issues and a multifaceted rendering of topics not possible in the single-author print model.

Frequently bought together

The future book will be a networked book or a " processed book " as Joseph Esposito [3] calls it. To process a book, he says, is more than simply building links to it; processing also includes a modification of the act of creation, which tends to encourage the absorption of the book into a network of applications, including but not restricted to commentary.

This "processing" creates iterations of the book: The iterations of Wikipedia are a good example of this principle. The networked book, as a process-based knowledge machine incorporates the thinking process of multiple authors. It is useful, in this case, to compare the processing of a networked book to the standard editorial procedures found in print culture.

Both print books and networked books originate from an idea conceived by a senior editor or an author. However, the participatory framework of a networked book is articulated by a designer, and executed by a programmer, before the content is written or assembled, thus creating an open book structure. Paper-based books are turned over to the designer, production artist and printer after the content is finished, resulting in a closed book structure.

The community of contributors acts as both author and reader, which is drastically different from the single-author print model wherein, reader is audience rather than co-creator. In a networked book, content is generated and revised by the community and the various iterations of the text are often saved and can be returned to and discussed.

In a paper-based book, content is generally constructed by a single author and is revised under the supervision of an editor. The readers have no part in this process and the revisions are only examined and debated in special cases, and then usually by scholars or authors, not by the general readership. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. This article may be in need of reorganization to comply with Wikipedia's layout guidelines. Please help by editing the article to make improvements to the overall structure.