Space and time are simply the tools for putting everything together. Consider the famous two-slit experiment. When scientists watch a particle pass through two slits in a barrier, the particle behaves like a bullet and goes through one slit or the other. So how can a particle change its behavior depending on whether you watch it or not? The answer is simple — reality is a process that involves your consciousness. If there is really a world out there with particles just bouncing around, then we should be able to measure all their properties. So why should it matter to a particle what you decide to measure?
Again, the answer is simple: Our linear way of thinking about time is also inconsistent with another series of experiments. They tested the communication between pairs of photons. They let one photon finish its journey — it had to decide whether to be either a wave or a particle. Researchers stretched the distance the other photon took to reach its own detector. However, they could add a scrambler to prevent it from collapsing into a particle. Somehow, the first particle knew what the researcher was going to do before it happened — and across distances instantaneously as if there were no space or time between them.
They decide not to become particles before their twin even encounters the scrambler. Our mind and its knowledge is the only thing that determines how they behave. Experiments consistently confirm these observer-dependent effects. Consider another experiment that was published in the prestigious scientific journal Science Jacques et al, , , Scientists in France shot photons into an apparatus, and showed that what they did could retroactively change something that had already happened in the past.
As the photons passed a fork in the apparatus, they had to decide whether to behave like particles or waves when they hit a beam splitter. Later on — well after the photons passed the fork — the experimenter could randomly switch a second beam splitter on and off. It turns out that what the observer decided at that point, determined what the particle actually did at the fork in the past.
The Case for Life After Death
At that moment, the experimenter chose his past. Of course, we live in the same world. But critics claim this behavior is limited to the microscopic world. From to , experiments have consistently shown that quantum behavior extends into the everyday realm. For example, Physicist Nicolas Gisin sent entangled particles zooming along optical fibers until they were seven miles apart. Today no one doubts the connectedness between bits of light or matter.
In fact, in , researchers published a paper in Nature Yin et al, , extending this distance to unprecedented lengths—they achieved quantum teleportation across Qinghai Lake in China, a distance roughly equivalent to the distance between New York City and Philadelphia. And in , KHC03 crystals exhibited entanglement ridges one-half inch high, quantum behavior nudging into the ordinary world of human-scale objects.
We generally reject the multiple universes of Star Trek as fiction, but it turns out there is more than a morsel of scientific truth to this popular genre. Instead, there is a range of possible observations each with a different probability. There are an infinite number of universes and everything that could possibly happen occurs in some universe. Death does not exist in any real sense in these scenarios. All possible universes exist simultaneously, regardless of what happens in any of them. Life is an adventure that transcends our ordinary linear way of thinking.
When we die, we do so not in the random billiard-ball-matrix but in the inescapable-life-matrix. Robert Lanza has published extensively in leading scientific journals. Powell, former editor-in-chief, Discover magazine. In biocentrism, Robert Lanza and Bob Berman team up to turn the planet upside down with the revolutionary view that life creates the universe instead of the other way around. Any short statement does not do justice to such a scholarly work… Most importantly, it makes you think.
Quantum theory has unfortunately become a catch-all phrase for trying to prove various kinds of New Age nonsense. QT says no such thing. QT deals with probabilities, and the likely places particles may appear, and likely actions they will take. And while, as we shall see, bits of light and matter do indeed change behavior depending on whether they are being observed, and measured particles do indeed appear to amazingly influence the past behavior of other particles, this does not in any way mean that humans can travel into their past or influence their own history.
Given the widespread generic use of QT, plus the paradigm-changing tenets of biocentrism, using QT as evidence might raise eyebrows among the skeptical. For those with a little patience, this chapter can provide a life-altering understanding of the latest version of one of the most famous and amazing experiments in the history of physics.
This specific version summarizes an experiment published in Physical Review A , 65 , in It all really started early in the 20 th century when physicists were still struggling with a very old question — whether light is made of particles called photons, or whether instead they are waves of energy. To find out, we use a source of either light or particles. A classic TV set, for example, directs electrons at the screen. We start by aiming light at a detector wall. First, however, the light must pass through an initial barrier with two holes. We can shoot a flood of light or just a single indivisible photon at a time — the results remain the same.
Each bit of light has a change of going through the right or the left slit. After awhile, all these photon-bullets will logically create a pattern — falling preferentially in the middle of the detector with fewer on the fringes, since most paths from the light source go more-or-less straight ahead. The laws of probability say that we should see a cluster of hits like this:. When plotted on a graph in which number of hits is vertical, and position on the detector screen horizontal the expected result for a barrage of particles is to indeed have more hits in the middle and fewer near the edges, which produces a curve like this:.
When experiments like this are performed — and they have been done thousands of times during the past century — we find that the bits of light instead create a curious pattern:. In theory, those smaller side peaks around the main one should be symmetrical. Anyway, the big question here is: Waves collide and interfere with each other, causing ripples. If you toss two pebbles into a pond at the same time, the waves of each meet each other and produce places of higher-than-normal, or lower-than-normal water-rises.
So this early 20 th -century result of an interference pattern, which can only be caused by waves, showed physicists that light is a wave, or at least acts that way when this experiment is performed. The fascinating thing is that when solid physical bodies like electrons were used, they got exactly the same result. Solid particles have a wave-nature too! So, right from the get-go, the double slit experiment yielded amazing information about the nature of reality. Solid objects have a wave nature! Unfortunately, or fortunately, this was just the appetizer. Few realized that true strangeness was only beginning.
The first oddity happens when just one just photon or electron is allowed to fly through the apparatus at a time. After enough have gone through and been individually detected, this same interference pattern emerges. But how can this be? With what is each of those electrons or photons interfering? There has never been a truly satisfactory answer for this. Wild ideas keep emerging. Could their electrons be interfering with ours?
The usual interpretation of why we see an interference pattern is that photons or electrons have two choices when they encounter the double slit. So when they reach the slits, they exercise their probabilistic freedom of taking both choices. When enough have gone through, we see the overall interference pattern as all probabilities congeal into actual entities making impacts and being observed — as waves. And this is just the very beginning of Quantum Weirdness. QT, as we mentioned last chapter, has a principle called complementarity which says that we can observe objects to be one thing or another — or have one position or property or another, but never both.
It depends on what one is looking for, and what measuring equipment is used. Now, suppose we wish to know which slit a given electron or photon has gone through, on its way to the barrier. We can use polarized light meaning light whose waves vibrate either horizontally or vertically or else slowly rotate their orientation and when such a mixture is used, we get the same result as before.
Each quarter wave plate alters the polarity of the light in a specific way. The detector can let us know the polarity of the incoming photon. Now we repeat the experiment, shooting photons through the slits one at a time, except this time we know which slot each photon goes through. Now the results dramatically change. Even though QWPs do not alter photons except for harmlessly shifting their polarities later we prove that this change in results is not caused by the QWPs , now we no longer get the interference pattern. Its wave nature was lost as soon as it lost its blurry probabilistic not-quite-real state.
But why should the photon have chosen to collapse its wave-function? How did it know that we, the observer, could learn which slit it went through? Countless attempts to get around this, by the greatest minds of the past century, have all failed. Our k nowledge of the photon or electron path alone caused it to become a definite entity ahead of the previous time.
Totally different which-way detectors have been built, none of which in any way disturbs the photon. Yet we always lose the interference pattern. If you fully learn about one, you will know nothing about the other. They can fly apart — even across the width of the galaxy — and yet they still retain this connection, this knowledge of each other.
If one becomes an electron with an up spin, the twin will too, but with a down spin. Experimenters can create the entangled photons by using a special crystal called beta-barium borate BBO. The two outbound entangled photons are sent off in different directions. One twin goes through the slits call this photon s while the other merely barrels ahead to a second detector.
Only when both detectors register hits at about the same time do we know that both twins have completed their journeys. Only then does something register on our equipment. The resulting pattern at detector S is our familiar interference pattern:. So the objects have remained probability waves. As expected, the interference pattern now vanishes, replaced with the particle pattern, the single curve. So far so good. We can do this by placing a polarizing window in the path of the other photon P, far away. This plate will stop the second detector from registering coincidences.
The interference pattern is back. The physical places on the back screen where the photons or electrons taking path s hit have now changed. We even left the QWPs in place. All we did was meddle with the twin photon far away so that it destroyed our ability to learn information. The only change was in our minds. How could photons taking path S possibly know that we put that other polarizer in place — somewhere else, far from their own paths? We now get an interference pattern even with the QWPs in place. This alone influences their actions.
Okay, this is bizarre. Yet these results happen every time, without fail. Could it get any weirder? Thus far the experiment involved erasing the which-way information by meddling with the path of p and then measuring its twin s. Perhaps some sort of communication takes place between photon p and s, letting s know what we will learn, and therefore giving it the green light to be a particle or a wave and either create or not create an interference pattern.
Maybe when photon p meets the polarizer it sends s an IM instant message at infinite speed, so that photon s knows it must materialize into a real entity instantly, which has to be a particle since only particles can go through one slit or the other and not both. This way, photons taking the S route will hit their own detectors first. But oddly enough, the results do not change! When we insert the QWPs to path S the fringes are gone; and when we insert the polarizing scrambler to path P and lose the coincidence-measuring ability that lets us determine which-way info for the S photons, the fringes return as before.
Photons taking the S-path already finished their journeys. They either went through one or the other slit, or both. The photons somehow know whether or not we will gain the which-way information in the future. After they lost consciousness, after they went into seizures, after they lost all muscle tone, when the blood stopped flowing in their brains, only then would they suddenly have a return to conscious awareness.
They had "dreamlets" as Dr. These dreamlets are similar to near-death experiences and they often involved a sense of separation from the physical body. A typical dreamlet involved a pilot leaving his physical body and traveling to a sandy beach, where he looked directly up at the sun. The pilots would remark that death is very pleasant. One of the strangest cases in the history of dream research is described in the documentary, The Secret World of Dreams. It describes the amazing story of a woman named Claire Sylvia. She was a professional dancer with several modern dance companies.
As the years passed, Claire's health began to deteriorate. Claire Sylvia had to undergo a heart and lung transplant. Soon after the transplant, she began having strange and incredibly vivid dreams about a young man she didn't recognize. Eventually, Claire realized that the young man in her dreams was the eighteen-year-old organ donor whose heart and lungs resided in her chest.
Through her continuing dream contacts with her donor, she learned a lot about him including his name. She then decided to do the research to find out if this "heavenly" information was correct. Yale University Pediatric Cancer specialist Dr. Diane Komp reported that many dying children have NDEs which often occurred during dreams. One boy, for example, told Dr. Komp that Jesus had visited him in a big yellow school bus and told him he would die soon.
The boy died as he predicted. According to the celebrated psychiatrist and dream analyst, Marie Louise Von Franz , and based on her analysis of over 10, dreams of the dying, the meaning being communicated is that the light of the individual, one of the common metaphors for life that we've heard so often, goes out at death but is miraculously renewed on the other side. In other words, the spirit seems to live on. This dream then illustrates perfectly a profound insight of the great psychoanalyst and mentor of Dr. In other words, our last dreams prepare us for death.
Complete with her own personal encounters, and those of numerous other DBV experiencers, this revolutionary work explores DBVs throughout history, from ancient Egypt to modern-day America. Through the visions and experiences common to all dying people, one can learn more about the spiritual journey that begins with death. On April 23, , the Washington Post reported: On August 12, , the Deseret News reported: One theory about how remote viewing works is that gifted or trained people can tap into a "Universal Mind.
Some of the most credible remote reviewers, such as Joseph McMoneagle , received their remote viewing powers from a near-death experience. Kenneth Ring was a brilliant young professor of psychology at the University of Connecticut who read Dr. Raymond Moody's book, Life After Life , and was inspired by it. However, he felt that a more scientifically structured study would strengthen Moody's findings. He sought out near-death survivors for his research. Kenneth Ring For the multitude of near-death experiencers who know they have left their bodies and received a glimpse of life after death, there is no amount of clinical explanation that will ever convince them otherwise.
Atheists believe in an afterlife after having NDEs. Atheists have deathbed experiences and near-death experiences just like everyone else does. The philosophy of Positivism , founded by the famous atheist named A. Ayer , is the philosophy that anything not verifiable by the senses is nonsense. Because NDEs mark the end of the senses, Positivists believe the survival of the senses after death is nonsense. But this philosophy has been challenged by its founder A. Later in life, Ayer had an NDE where he saw a red light.
Ayer's NDE made him a changed man: Can there be life after life? Professor Antony Flew now believes there is scientific evidence supporting the theory of some sort of intelligence behind the creation the universe. Professor Flew, 81, a professor emeritus of philosophy at the University of Reading, said that this was the only explanation for the origin of life The NDE researcher P. Atwater has pointed out the fascinating anomaly that an amazing number of people important to the evolution of humankind may well have had such an episode during their childhood.
Reports of near-death experiences are not a new phenomenon. A great number of them have been recorded over a period of thousands of years. The oldest surviving explicit report of an NDE in Western literature comes from the famed Greek philosopher, Plato , who describes an event in his tenth book of his legendary book entitled Republic. Plato discusses the story of Er, a soldier who awoke on his funeral pyre and described his journey into the afterlife. But this story is not just a random anecdote for Plato. He integrated at least three elements of the NDE into his philosophy: The following NDE descriptions of consciousness expansion supports the theory of consciousness described above by Stanislav Grof.
It theorizes that the brain acts as a reducing valve of cosmic input to produce consciousness. At death, this reducing-valve function ceases and consciousness is then free to expand. The following NDEs support this: NDEs triggered by drugs satisfies the scientific method.
Karl Jansen is a Member of the Royal College of Psychiatrists and is the world's leading expert on ketamine. He has studied ketamine at every level. While earning his doctorate in clinical pharmacology at the University of Oxford, he photographed the receptors to which ketamine binds in the human brain. He has published papers on his discovery of the similarities between ketamine's psychoactive effects and the near-death experience during his study of medicine in New Zealand. However, this is not to say there are no problems with comparing hallucinations with NDEs as will be shown later in this web page.
Karl Jansen's ketamine research findings include: NDEs are not a denial of reality, as is often seen in drug or oxygen deprivation induced hallucinations. There are not the distortions of time, place, body image and disorientations seen in drug induced experiences. They instead typically involve the perception of another reality superimposed over this one.
For example, one young boy told Dr. Melvin Morse that "god took me in his hands and kept me safe" while medics were frantically trying to revived his body after a near drowning. He said and understood everything happening to him, but simply perceived something we usually don't perceive at other times in our lives.
Robert Lanza » What Happens When You Die? Evidence Suggests Time Simply Reboots
German psychiatrist Michael Schroeter-Kunhardt in his extensive review of all published near death research states there is no reason to believe NDEs are the result of psychiatric pathology or brain dysfunction. NDEs change people unlike hallucinations and dreams. No matter what the nature of the NDE, it alters lives. Alcoholics find themselves unable to imbibe. Hardened criminals opt for a life of helping others. Atheists embrace the existence of a deity , while dogmatic members of a particular religion report "feeling welcome in any church or temple or mosque.
Moody interviewed near-death patients who reported vivid experiences flashing back to childhood, coming face to face with Christ. He found that those who had undergone NDEs became more altruistic, less materialistic, and more loving. Bruce Greyson and Ian Stevenson have been instrumental in gathering evidence indicating that religious backgrounds do not affect who is most likely to have an NDE. They have mapped out the conversion-like effects of NDEs that can sometimes lead to hardship. Having stared eternity in the face, he observes, those who return often lose their taste for ego-boosting achievement.
Not even the diehard skeptics doubt the powerful personal effects of NDEs. After his NDE, Mellen-Thomas Benedict brought back a great deal of scientific information concerning biophotonics , cellular communication , quantum biology , and DNA research. Mellen-Thomas Benedict currently holds eight U. I was brought in with Dr. By the way, this was videotaped and recorded. At that time, I could do almost a self hypnosis and get to the light.
In those days, the only tools that I brought with me were a big pad of paper and large Crayola crayons. I could sit there, go to the light and still speak to you and draw pictures while seeing. A big horse shoe facing down on the bottom and a smaller horse shoe facing up on top. If we can figure out a way to cleave that head off, I think we can cure this.
I helped decode a genetic disease and the information was very accurate. Everybody thanked me and I went away. Then about three months later, I started getting letters and calls saying, 'My God, you hit it right on the head! There is no way you could have had this information in advance. I worked in a lot of think tanks with some very impressive world class scientists over the next ten years until I retired from all that in In a hospital in Switzerland in , the world-renowned psychiatrist Carl G.
Jung , had a heart attack and then a near-death experience. His vivid encounter with the light, plus the intensely meaningful insights led Jung to conclude that his experience came from something real and eternal. Jung's experience is unique in that he saw the Earth from a vantage point of about a thousand miles above it. His incredibly accurate view of the Earth from outer space was described about two decades before astronauts in space first described it.
Subsequently, as he reflected on life after death, Jung recalled the meditating Hindu from his near-death experience and read it as a parable of the archetypal Higher Self , the God-image within. Carl Jung, who founded analytical psychology , centered on the archetypes of the collective unconscious. Philosophies and religions were founded on NDEs.
The famed Greek philosopher, Plato , described at the conclusion of his legendary work entitled Republic , the NDE account of a soldier named Er which has greatly influenced religious, philosophical, and scientific thought for many centuries.. Plato integrated at least three elements of this NDE into his philosophy: When it comes to religion, one NDE was responsible for making Christianity a world religion. The apostle Paul once persecuted Christians until he converted to Christianity himself because of an NDE which he described as follows: Whether it was in the body or out of the body I do not know - God knows.
And I know that this person - whether in the body or apart from the body I do not know, but God knows - was caught up to paradise. He heard inexpressible things, things that people are not permitted to tell. In this letter, Paul based his authority as an apostle on this NDE. Some or all of his revelations of Jesus certainly came from this NDE. The Bardo Thodol is a guide that is read aloud to the dead while they are in the out-of-body state between death and reincarnation in order for them to recognize the nature of their mind and attain liberation from the cycle of rebirth.
The Bardo Thodol teaches that once awareness is freed from the body, it creates its own reality as one would experience in a lucid dream. This dream occurs in various afterlife realms bardos in ways both wonderful and terrifying. Overwhelming peaceful and wrathful visions and beings appear. Because the deceased may be in a state of confusion due to its disconnection from its physical body, it might need help and guidance in order for enlightenment and liberation Nirvana to occur.
The Bardo Thodol teaches how we can attain Nirvana by recognizing the heavenly realms instead of entering into the lower realms where the cycle of birth and rebirth continue. Kenneth Ring believes NDEs can be viewed psychologically as archetypal initiatory journeys involving a death of one's old ego and a rebirth of a new Self. In addition, he thinks an adequate interpretation must incorporate the spiritual realm of Kundalini experiences, the imaginal realm , and the Mind at Large.
A Reader , this shift in thinking will deconstruct our traditional Western worldview. It may bring a dramatic next step of evolution towards a more ecological and more compassionate consciousness. On October 4, , the University of Arizona announced a study conducted by Dr. This was achieved by testing highly qualified psychic mediums to see if they could contact the dead. The success of this study is important in that it supports NDE research in providing a scientific foundation toward investigating the survival of consciousness after death.
An after-death communication ADC is a spiritual experience that occurs when a person is contacted directly and spontaneously by a family member or friend who has died. During their seven years of research, Bill and Judy Guggenheim at www. Their book, Hello From Heaven , documents many such experiences. On September 11, , new research by the Institute of Psychiatry caused British scientists to announce that there is convincing evidence that people are capable of paranormal feats, such as premonitions, telepathy, and out-of-body experiences.
The British Association for the Advancement of Science was told an increasing number of experiments support the theory of a human "sixth sense" - an ability which may have its roots in our past, when the ability to sense the presence of a predator was a matter of life or death. The view that people are capable of paranormal feats, such as premonitions, telepathy, and out-of-body experiences, is supported by new research by the Institute of Psychiatry, which suggests the human mind may exist outside the body like an invisible magnetic field.
The research is being led by Dr. Peter Fenwick , a neuropsychiatrist at London University, who has just completed a survey of heart patients claiming to have had "near-death experiences" after their hearts had stopped beating. Melvin Morse is the former Associate Professor of Pediatrics at the University of Washington and has studied near-death experiences in children for over 15 years and is the author of several outstanding books on the subject.
CHIEF SCIENTIFIC OFFICER OF OCATA THERAPEUTICS (formerly Advanced Cell Technology)
In his book, Where God Lives , Morse makes the case that a connection to the right temporal lobe of the brain the "God Spot" to a higher power or "force" in the universe has been validated in the merging of scientific and paranormal research. Such research includes the following: Raymond Moody , who became famous for his pioneering studies of NDEs, has been working on ways of inducing facilitated apparitions in a controlled setting.
He took as his model classic works from ancient Greece which suggested that when people wished to contact a deceased loved one they consulted with an 'oracle' at a psychomanteum. A psychomanteum is a specially built laboratory using mirrors to help facilitate the psychic process. Part of the actual psychic process includes the sending of telepathic messages, sending vibrations - to the selected recipient in the afterlife. According to Dianne Arcangel , an associate of Dr. Moody, in some cases when contact is made with intelligences from the afterlife information is transmitted to reveal something that the person seeking contact does not know Moody gives full instructions on how to create your own psychomanteum in his book Reunions: These findings support NDE research findings which demonstrates the reality of a transcendent consciousness.
Larry Dossey has done extensive research on the efficacy of prayer and has written several excellent books on the subject. On June 11, , at Princeton University, Dr. Ian Stevenson presented a paper entitled: These findings support reincarnation in NDE research findings as well. Reincarnation has been called by some to be the greatest unknown scientific discovery today.
In the last chapter of Dr. Ian Stevenson's book entitled Twenty Cases Suggestive of Reincarnation , he provides rigorous scientific reasoning to show how reincarnation is the only viable explanation that fits the facts of his study. He considers every possible alternative explanation for his twenty cases of young children who were spontaneously able to describe a previous lifetime as soon as they learned to talk.
He was able to rule out each alternative explanation using one or more aspects of these cases. Later research has even bolstered his case in favor of the existence of reincarnation. His study is also completely reproducible which means that anybody who doubts the validity of this study is perfectly welcome to repeat it for themselves.
I believe it is only a short matter of time before his discovery of the existence of reincarnation is finally realized by the scientific community and the world to be accepted as one of the greatest scientific discoveries of all time. Amber Wells was a student at the University of Connecticut and wrote a research paper based on her study of the near-death experience for her senior honors thesis under the direction of Dr.
Her paper was published in the Journal of Near-Death Studies in the fall of Claims have been documented by other researchers of direct knowledge of reincarnation which became available during the near-death experience itself. Ken Ring by John Robinson: One of the most amazing psychic phenomena, which religionists, skeptics and atheists have continuously and deliberately ignored is xenoglossy - the ability to speak or write a foreign language a person never learned.
After all other explanations have been investigated - such as fraud, genetic memory, telepathy and cryptomnesia the remembering of a foreign language learned earlier , xenoglossy is taken as evidence of either memories of a language learned in a past life or of communication with a discarnate entity— a spirit person. There are many cases on record of adults and children speaking and writing languages which they have never learned. Sometimes this happens spontaneously but more often it occurs while the person is under hypnosis or in an altered state of consciousness.
In some cases it is only a few words remembered but in other cases the person becomes totally fluent and able to converse with native speakers sometimes in obscure dialects which have not been in use for centuries. There are literally thousands of xenoglossic cases, many hundreds of which have been documented. They involve modern and ancient languages from all over the world. Psychic investigators, such the highly credible Dr. Ian Stevenson , used scientific method to illustrate xenoglossy and claim that there are only two possible explanations — either spirit contact or past life memory both of which are evidence for the afterlife.
Past life regression such as that practiced by Dr. Michael Newton , simply involves placing a person under hypnosis and asking them to go back through their childhood to a time before they were born. In many cases the person begins talking about his or her life or lives before the present lifetime, about their previous death and about the time between lives including the planning of the present lifetime. The main reason why at least some of these claims must be considered as evidence are: Victor Zammit is a lawyer who has collected a large body of evidence supporting the reality of an afterlife.
Zammit has an excellent article concerning what many regard as the greatest afterlife experiment in the world. The evidence collected over a period of more than four years and with more than sittings by the Scole Experiments and the afterlife team is absolute, definitive and irrefutable. Scole is a village in Norfolk, England. Using it as a base, mediums Robin and Sandra Foy and Alan and Diana Bennett and other experimenters produced brilliant evidence of the afterlife in England, the U.
Ireland and in Spain. Their results are being repeated by other groups around the world and will convince even the toughest open-minded skeptic. The group began with two mediums delivering messages from a non-physical group. Many of these messages contained personal information that nobody else could know about. Soon the messages came in the form of voices which could be heard by all in the room.
Then came the actual materialization of people and objects from the non-physical side. For more than 50 years, experimenters all over the world have been tape recording "paranormal voices" - voices which cannot be heard when a tape recorder is playing but which can be heard when the tape is played back. Many of these messages have been reported to be from loved ones who have passed on. Such messages would include the experimenter's name and also answers to the experimenter's questions. It is a phenomenon known as "EVP" or " electronic voice phenomenon " and there are thousands of researchers around the world researching this fascinating psychic phenomenon.
This phenomenon is particularly relevant to evidence supporting the survival hypothesis because it follows strict scientific procedures and have been duplicated under laboratory conditions by various of researchers in many different countries. One particular recording changed his life forever. As a result, in , Raudive began to conduct his own EVP research and with the help of various electronics experts, Raudive recorded over , audiotapes, most of which were conducted using strict laboratory conditions.
The Truth About Near Death Experiences: Scientific Explanations of NDE and OBE
Raudive would confirm the accuracy of his recordings by inviting listeners to hear and interpret them. Over people were involved in his EVP research and all heard the voices. This culminated in his book entitled " Breakthrough: The popular paranormal TV series called " Ghost Adventures " features an overwhelmingly number of convincing EVP recordings as they occur.
The user could allegedly, for example, give police precise details about a murder or other violent crime if they were at the crime scene or were holding the weapon used.
- Is the Afterlife Real? | goop.
- There is NO life after death: Scientist insists afterlife is IMPOSSIBLE!
- The Spirit of Liberty Moon: A Novel (Touched By An Angel)?
- How to Inherit the Earth: Submitting Ourselves to a Servant Savior.
Stefan Ossowiecki , a Russian-born psychic, is one of the most famous psychometrists. Ossowiecki claimed to be able to see people's auras and to move objects through psychokinesis. His psychic gifts enabled this chemical engineer to locate lost objects and missing people, and he assisted in several criminal investigations. In , he participated in a test of his psychometric powers - a test devised by a wealthy Hungarian named Dionizy Jonky that involved a sealed package. Jonky stipulated that this test was to be conducted eight years after his death. Jonky and Ossowiecki did not know each other.
First, 14 photographs of men were placed in front of Ossowiecki, one of which was of Jonky. Ossowiecki picked out the correct photo. Next, Ossowiecki accurately described many details of Jonky's life and correctly identified the man who held the package for the past eight years. Finally, Ossowiecki was presented with the sealed package Jonky had prepared before his death. Ossowiecki touched the package and concentrated. Inside the package was a meteorite encased in a candy wrapper. In later experiments, Ossowiecki performed remarkable psychometric feats with archeological objects - a kind of psychic archeology.
These tests were conducted by Stanislaw Poniatowski, a professor of enthology at the University of Warsaw who could verify the accuracy of what Ossowiecki "saw. In other tests he provided similar descriptions of people who lived as long ago as , years. Some of the information he provided was not even known by experts at the time, but confirmed by discoveries years later!
Ossowiecki described his visions as being like a motion picture that he could watch, pause, rewind and fast-forward - like a videotape or DVD. Other anomalous phenomena supports the Afterlife Hypothesis including astral projection research such as that done by Jerry Gross. Also anomalous phenomena associated with the following: All neurological theories concluding NDEs to be only a brain anomaly, must show how the core elements of the NDE occur subjectively because of specific neurological events triggered by the approach of death.
These core elements include: The Case of Pam Reynolds Book: Brain Physiology or Transcendental Consciousness? Some People Correctly Foresee the Future: The NDE and the Future: Kevin Williams' Research Conclusions Article: Edgar Cayce on the Future. The NDE and Science: Kevin Williams' Research Conclusions Book: Beyond Medicine and Religion , by Allan Kellehear. Transformed by the Light: Kevin Williams' Research Conclusions.
Official Website of Stanislav Grof Article: When the Impossible Happens: Consciousness and the Mystery of Death , by Stanislav Grof. Moody's research findings are confirmed. NDEs happen to people of all races, genders, ages, education, marital status, and social class. Religious orientation is not a factor.
People are convinced of the reality of their NDE experience. Drugs do not appear to be a factor. NDEs are not hallucinations. NDEs often involve unparalleled feelings. People lose their fear of death and appreciate life more after having an NDE. People's lives are transformed after having an NDE. The Official Site of Dr. Soul-searching doctors find life after death , Telegraph UK. Carl Becker examined four ways in which NDEs may be considered objective: Paranormal knowledge that is later verified 2.
The similarity of deathbed events in different cultures 3. Differences between religious expectations and visionary experiences 4. Third-party observations of visionary figures, indicating that they were not merely subjective hallucinations Becker, The End of Materialism: The Seat of Soaring Consciousness: The Trigger of Brain Stimulation: Official Website of Pim van Lommel Article: Acceleration Induced Loss of Consciousness: The Trigger of Gravity: Dreams and the Near-Death Experience: A Connection to the Afterlife News: Precognitive Dreams , Science Frontiers.
Parting Visions , by David Sunfellow Article: Remote Viewing, Wikipedia Article: E vidence of the Afterlife: Remote Viewing , by Victor Zammit. I could feel my mind expanding and absorbing and each new piece of information somehow seemed to belong. It came into me..
It seemed I went out into it. I expanded into it as it came into my field off consciousness. And now I feel my presence in every room in the hospital. Even the tiniest space in the hospital is filled with this presence that is me. I sense myself beyond the hospital, above the city, even encompassing Earth. I am melting into the universe. I am everywhere at once. Susan had an out-of-body experience where she left her body and grew very big, as big as a planet at first, and then she filled the solar system and finally she became as large as the universe.
NDEs and ketamine produce identical visions see Ketamine: NDEs and ketamine both induce real visions of a real god see this Lycaeum. Ketamine affects the right temporal lobe, the hippocampus and associated structures in the brain, the "God" spot see this online paper Can Science Replace Religion? Kevin Williams' Research Conclusions: The NDE and Science. Is There Life After Death? The Father of Analytical Psychology: Analytical Psychology, Wikipedia Article: Carl Jung, Wikipedia Book: Memories, Dreams, Reflections , by Carl G. The Jung Page and Center.
Jung and the Beyond , by Eduard C. A Reader , by Lee W. Bailey, Jenny Yates Book: The Red Book , by Carl G. Scientist Claims Proof of Afterlife Study: Bill and Judy Guggenheim's Research Article: The Ghosts of Flight , by John G. Horizon Research Foundation, President. Right temporal lobe activity verifies the reality of the brain's connection to a higher power see Where God Lives 2. Evidence exists supporting the theory that consciousness exists in some form after death see the NDE of Pam Reynolds. The brain can be induced to have paranormal experiences see The Trigger of Brain Stimulation.
Consciousness research supports the reality of discarnate consciousness see Dr. Scientific evidence exists supporting the theory of reincarnation see Dr. Official Website of Joseph McMoneagle. The Trigger of Psychomanteum: Raymond Moody's Psychomanteum Research. Can Reincarnation Be Proven? The NDE and Reincarnation: The True Resurrection Article: Abraham Lincoln and John F. The regression frequently leads to a cure of a physical illness..
In some cases the person regressed begins to speak an unlearned foreign language. In some cases the person being regressed remembers details of astonishing accuracy which when checked out are verified by the top historians. The emotional intensity of the experience is such that it convinces many formerly skeptical psychiatrists who are used to dealing with fantasy and imagined regressions.
In some cases the alleged cause of death in an immediate past life is reflected by a birthmark in the present life. Michael Newton and the Journey of Souls Website: Near-Death Experiences and the Afterlife. Stanislav Grof , Hal Zina Bennett. Edward Kelly , Dr.
Robert Lanza , Dr. Janice Holden , Dr. Bruce Greyson , Dr. Jeffrey Long , Paul Perry.
Sam Parnia , Josh Young. Melvin Morse , Paul Perry. Janice Holden , Anthony Peake , et al. Peter Fenwick, Elizabeth Fenwick. Gary Schwartz , Dr. People have NDEs while they are brain dead. Atheists believe in an afterlife after having an NDE. Out-of-body perception during NDEs have been verified. People born blind can see during an NDE.
NDEs have been reported for thousands of years. People have been clinically dead for several days. The expansion of consciousness occurs during NDEs. People having NDEs have brought back scientific discoveries. NDEs have produced visions of the future which later became true. NDEs are different from hallucinations. Groups of dying people share the same NDE. NDEs cannot be explained by brain chemistry alone. NDEs have advanced the field of medical science. The skeptical "dying brain" theory of NDEs has been falsified.
NDEs have advanced the field of psychology. Skeptical arguments against NDEs are not valid. NDEs have advanced the fields of philosophy and religion. Quantum theory supports concepts found in NDEs. NDEs have the nature of an archetypal initiatory journey. Contact with the deceased have occurred under scientific controls. NDEs support the "reducing valve" theory of consciousness. Many people have experienced after-death communications.
A transcendental "sixth sense" of the human mind exists. Memories of NDEs are more real than normal memories. The brain's connection to a higher power has been validated. Raymond Moody's NDE study has been replicated. Apparitions of the dead have been induced under scientific controls. NDEs have been validated in scientific studies. Studies show prayer to be effective under scientific controls. Scientific evidence of reincarnation supports an afterlife. Out-of-body experiences have been validated in scientific studies. NDEs support the reality of reincarnation.
The replication of OBEs satisfies the scientific method. Xenoglossy supports reincarnation and an afterlife. Autoscopy during NDEs have been validated in scientific studies. Past-life regression supports reincarnation and an afterlife. Experimental evidence shows NDEs are real experiences. Dream research supports NDEs and an afterlife. Electronic voice phenomena supports NDEs and an afterlife. Deathbed visions supports NDEs and an afterlife.
Product details
Psychometry supports NDEs and an afterlife. Remote viewing supports NDEs and an afterlife. Other anomalous phenomena supports an afterlife. People having NDEs are convinced they saw an afterlife. The burden of proof has shifted to skeptics of an afterlife.